Skip to main content

Mora v. State

Citations

  • 814 So. 2d 322
  • 2002 WL 87463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court committed reversible error by requiring a defendant to choose between the right to counsel and the right to forgo mitigation investigation
  • concluding that, under the circumstances, trial court erred by failing to respect defendant’s wishes that penalty phase counsel be precluded from contacting defendant’s elderly family members for purposes of developing mitigation
  • “[A] trial judge is not required to give an instruction where there is no nexus between the evidence in the record and the requested instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.