Supreme Court of Florida· 1/24/2002
Mora v. State
Citations
- 814 So. 2d 322
- 2002 WL 87463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court committed reversible error by requiring a defendant to choose between the right to counsel and the right to forgo mitigation investigation
- concluding that, under the circumstances, trial court erred by failing to respect defendant’s wishes that penalty phase counsel be precluded from contacting defendant’s elderly family members for purposes of developing mitigation
- “[A] trial judge is not required to give an instruction where there is no nexus between the evidence in the record and the requested instruction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 223×
- Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 152×
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-08-27· cited 113×
- Coday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 94×
- Twilegar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-07· cited 73×
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-29· cited 39×
- Hernandez-Alberto v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-23· cited 36×
- Samson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 26×
- Worley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-03· cited 26×
- In Re Commitment of ReillyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-07· cited 22×
- Dortch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04· cited 22×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-30· cited 19×
- Brockman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-08· cited 18×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-07-07· cited 17×
- Palmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-07· cited 16×
- Puglisi v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-04-11· cited 16×
- Goode v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-22· cited 12×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 10×
- Starkes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-14· cited 7×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-18· cited 539×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
- Hardwick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 198×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-01· cited 175×
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 153×
- Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-16· cited 128×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 122×
- Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 104×
- Linehan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 89×
- State v. WellerSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-07· cited 84×
- Waterhouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-31· cited 81×
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-12-12· cited 73×
- State v. TaitSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-12· cited 66×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-17· cited 45×
- Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 44×
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 44×
- Jaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.