Skip to main content

Mendoza v. State

Citations

  • 700 So. 2d 670
  • 1997 WL 633315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a \robbery gone awry\ argument where the trial court found two aggravators: a prior violent felony—armed robbery in connection with a separate case—and commission during a robbery
  • finding evidentiary error to be harmless under the circumstances of the case, even though argued to the jury
  • no statutory mental mitigation and only minimal nonstatutory mitigating evidence of drug use and mental health problems
  • \[E]rroneously admitted evidence concerning a defendant's character in a penalty phase is subject to a harmless error review . . . .\
  • \[T]he trial court erred in overruling appellant's objection to the State's question to Dr. Toomer during cross-examination and the comment in the State's closing argument asking whether Dr. Toomer was aware that the defendant had a pending trial in other robberies using a firearm.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.