Skip to main content

Peek v. State

Citations

  • 395 So. 2d 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \There is no per se rule which pinpoints a particular age as an automatic factor in mitigating.\
  • trial court erred in finding that capital felony was committed for pecuniary gain where record did not support the conclusion that victim was murdered to facilitate the theft
  • “Relevant physical evidence is admissible unless there is an indication of probable tampering.”
  • “Relevant physical evidence is admissible unless there is an indication of probable tampering.”
  • evidence insufficient to establish aggravating factor that crime was committed for pecuniary gain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.