Zimin v. Zimin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not error for the superior court to decline to apply the Rose approach when the parties did not “maintain completely separate economic identities” during their marriage
• holding it was not abuse of discretion for court to decline to apply Rose where the parties “did not maintain completely separate economic identities” during marriage
• explaining that. “we believe that a three-year average would provide an accurate estimate of a parent's current earning capacity when a parent's income is 'subject to yearly fluctuations”
• stating “a ten-year average is generally not a reliable indicator of an obligor parent’s current earning capacity”
• upholding income determination that rejected obligor’s proposed ten-year average and instead based support award on his one-year projected earnings
• approving a child support order based on income retrospectively averaged over a three-year period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).