Skip to main content
· 5/4/1972

Vanover v. Vanover

Citations

  • 496 P.2d 644
  • 1972 Alas. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the contributions of a pecuniary or “more intangible nature” have benefited “in any manner” the premarital property of the other spouse, the superior court may distribute the premarital property
  • any other factors bearing on whether the equities dictate that the other spouse is entitled to share in the property may be considered
  • specifically addressing the 1968 amendments to the statute relied upon by Mr. Courtney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, Boney, Boochever

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.