Alaska Supreme Court· 6/22/1990
Bell v. Bell
Citations
- 794 P.2d 97
- 1990 Alas. LEXIS 79
- 1990 WL 85483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Rose approach is inappropriate where parties bought and improved property together and jointly made payments on premarital property
- noting that shared legal custody means that parents share responsibility for making major decisions affecting child's welfare
- holding that “[sjince the question whether the trial court employed the correct legal analysis [in applying the Rose rescission remedy] is a question of law, review of [the] claim [that this application was incorrect] is based upon our independent judgment.”
- recognizing the legislature's intent to favor joint legal custody, regardless of the physical custody arrangement
- concluding that Rose did not apply because the parties commingled assets
- concluding commingling was \hardly insignificant\ and reversing trial court's application of Rose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Compton, Matthews, Moore, Rabino, Witz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 55×
- Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 51×
- Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court· 1998-01-16· cited 45×
- Farrell v. FarrellAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-11-01· cited 44×
- Ronny M. v. Nanette H.Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-05-31· cited 43×
- Harrelson v. HarrelsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-02-14· cited 43×
- Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-08-14· cited 41×
- Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-31· cited 31×
- Crane v. CraneAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-09-10· cited 29×
- Renfro v. RenfroAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 29×
- Lowdermilk v. LowdermilkAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 26×
- McDougall v. LumpkinAlaska Supreme Court· 2000-11-03· cited 23×
- Ulsher v. UlsherAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-02-11· cited 17×
- Holl v. HollAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-08-16· cited 10×
- Pfeil v. LockAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-10-25· cited 9×
- McCoy v. McCoyAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-11-15· cited 8×
- Brenna M. Outwater, f/k/a Brenna M. Ahmasuk v. Brandon D. AhmasukAlaska Supreme Court· 2025-08-01
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-02-06· cited 197×
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-05-13· cited 139×
- Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-09-04· cited 77×
- Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-08-14· cited 56×
- McClain v. McClainAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-04-04· cited 43×
- Rose v. RoseAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-06-10· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.