Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/1/1992

Young v. State

Citations

826 S.W.2d 141
1991 WL 99936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that comparative analysis, pointing to specific testimony, may be made for first time on appeal, where defense counsel offered general rebuttal argument and “quarreled with the State’s reason” at trial
holding that comparative analysis, pointing to specific testimony, may be made for first time on appeal, where defense counsel offered general rebuttal argument and \quarreled with the State's reason\ at trial
holding that appellant could raise disparate-treatment Batson challenge for first time on appeal
holding that comparative analysis, pointing to specific testimony, may be made for first time on appeal, where defense counsel offered general rebuttal argument and \quarreled with the State's reason\ at trial
holding that appellant could raise disparate-treatment Batson challenge for first time on appeal
“A comparative analysis is not necessary to apprise the trial court that the defendant is asserting an objection to the State’s jury selection based upon Batson and thus is not necessary to preserve a Batson claim for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Benavides, White, McCormick, Campbell, Bena-Vides, Motions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.