Skip to main content

Reynolds v. State

Citations

  • 204 S.W.3d 386
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2038
  • 2006 WL 2956213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, to rule on the admissibility of the test results, the trial court need only determine whether the technique was properly applied on the occasion in question
  • stating that Legislature has determined that “the underlying scientific theory” for measuring alcohol concentration by analysis of breath specimens is “valid.”
  • applying standard in Kelly v. State , 824 S.W.2d 568, 572 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) to breath-test results
  • officer’s knowledge of nearby festival, odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and admission of some drinking sufficient to warrant field sobriety test
  • scientific evidence is presumed to satisfy the Kelly test
  • trial court satisfies gate- keeping function to determine whether technique used in breath test was properly applied “[a]s long as the operator knows the protocol involved in administering the test and can testify that he followed it on the occasion in question . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.