Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/2/1994

Ex Parte Little

Citations

887 S.W.2d 62
1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 118
1994 WL 595399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial judge’s discretion to declare a mistrial based on manifest necessity is limited to “very extraordinary and striking circumstances”
concluding trial judge's discretion to declare mistrial based on manifest necessity limited to “very extraordinary and striking circumstances”
concluding trial judge's discretion to declare mistrial based on manifest necessity limited to \very extraordinary and striking circumstances\
concluding trial judge's discretion to declare mistrial based on manifest necessity limited to \very extraordinary and striking circumstances\
stating objection may be phrased in any manner which sufficiently apprises trial court and opposing counsel of nature of complaint.
stating objection may be phrased in any manner which sufficiently apprises trial court and opposing counsel of nature of the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, McCormick, Campbell, Meyers, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ex Parte Little

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.