Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/29/1991

Black v. State

Citations

816 S.W.2d 350
1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105
1991 WL 87594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant, who was tried in 1986, could not be faulted for not objecting because the law changed three years later in 1989 with the decision in Penry
determining that the future-dangerousness special issue was adequate for the jury to consider the evidence that was presented, which did not include allegations of child abuse or trauma
determining that the future-dangerousness special issue was adequate for the jury to consider the evidence that was presented, which did not include allegations of child abuse or trauma
determining that the future-dangerousness special issue was adequate for the jury to consider the evidence that was presented, which did not include allegations of child abuse or trauma
Campbell, J., concurring, joined by McCormick, P J., and Clinton, Overstreet, Ma-loney and Benavides, JJ.
Campbell, J., concurring, joined by McCormick, P.J., and Clinton, Overstreet, Maloney and Benavides, JJ.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Campbell, Baird, Clinton, Maloney, McCormick, Overstreet, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

106 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.