Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 765 N.W.2d 85
  • 2009 Minn. LEXIS 292
  • 2009 WL 1324113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that counsel does not act unreasonably by not asserting claims that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail
  • holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel where appellate counsel did not assert an insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim because counsel could have legitimately concluded the claim would fail
  • “Counsel does not act unreasonably by not asserting claims that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.