Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/14/2009
Wright v. State
Citations
- 765 N.W.2d 85
- 2009 Minn. LEXIS 292
- 2009 WL 1324113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that counsel does not act unreasonably by not asserting claims that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail
- holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel where appellate counsel did not assert an insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim because counsel could have legitimately concluded the claim would fail
- “Counsel does not act unreasonably by not asserting claims that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gildea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-03-20· cited 88×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-12-29· cited 58×
- State v. GatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-03· cited 53×
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 47×
- Timothy Alan Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-11-02· cited 42×
- Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-06· cited 23×
- Sontoya v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-01· cited 21×
- Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-07-29· cited 20×
- Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-06-15· cited 14×
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-09· cited 13×
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-13· cited 13×
- Onyelobi v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-08-07· cited 12×
- Laine v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-08-05· cited 9×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-01· cited 7×
- Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-06-15· cited 4×
- Larry Jonnell Gilbert v. State of Minnesota, A21-1560, Supreme Court, January 17, 2024Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-01-17
- Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2025-10-06
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 146×
- Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-10· cited 86×
- Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-03-23· cited 71×
- State v. LitzauSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-30· cited 69×
- State v. HannonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 43×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-03-23· cited 41×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-05-20· cited 37×
- State v. SessionsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-02-08· cited 30×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-21· cited 29×
- State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-17· cited 28×
- Arredondo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-14· cited 23×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-17· cited 21×
- Gail v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-07· cited 20×
- Nunn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-24· cited 14×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 14×
- Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-28· cited 11×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.