Skip to main content

Laine v. State

Citations

  • 786 N.W.2d 635
  • 2010 Minn. LEXIS 451
  • 2010 WL 3034249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the petitioner’s claim was an “argumentative assertion” that lacked any support
  • concluding that the petitioner’s claim was an “argumentative assertion” that lacked any support
  • holding that appellant’s assertion that he had new medical testimony did not warrant an evidentiary hearing when the appellant offered “no (Footnote continued from previous page.) unsupported by either arguments or citations to legal authority”
  • trial court properly admitted victim’s out-of-court statements to show the defendant’s prior acts of domestic abuse in murder trial; statements were nontestimonial because they were made to friends and coworkers, not law enforcement officers
  • \[A] memorandum written by a defense investigator declaring that a witness provided different information to the investigator than the witness provided at trial [is] insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing.\ (citing State v. Ferguson , 742 N.W.2d 651 , 659-60 (Minn. 2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyer, Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.