State v. Hannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Minnesota constitution requires that when an accused makes an ambiguous or equivocal statement that can reasonably be interpreted as a request for an attorney, questioning must stop except for narrow questions to clarify the suspect’s intentions
• holding Minnesota constitution requires that when an accused makes an ambiguous or equivocal statement that can reasonably be interpreted as a request for an attorney, questioning must stop except for narrow questions to clarify the suspect's intentions
• warning defendant that “his side of [the] story [would] never be known” after defendant invoked his right to counsel violated defendant’s rights
• warning defendant that “his side of [the] story [would] never be known” after defendant invoked his right to counsel violated defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).