Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/23/2006
White v. State
Citations
- 711 N.W.2d 106
- 2006 Minn. LEXIS 145
- 2006 WL 723486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the interests of justice did not justify review when individual failed to challenge composition of jury at proper time
- stating that an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim is generally Knaffla-barred if it can be decided on the basis of the trial record and the briefs
- barring all postconviction claims that were known \or should have been known\ at the time of direct appeal
- “All of these claims can be decided on the basis of the district court record and are therefore Knaffla-barred on this postconviction review.”
- “[W]e conclude that [petitioner’s] claims of racial discrimination in the selection of the grand jury * * * are also barred by the Knaffla rule because [petitioner] knew or should have known of these claims at the time of his direct appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 146×
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-05-07· cited 135×
- Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-03-20· cited 88×
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-18· cited 60×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-05-14· cited 36×
- Schneider v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-01-04· cited 35×
- Powers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-05-17· cited 33×
- Sanchez-Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-12-24· cited 30×
- Pippitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 26×
- Tyrone White v. Lynn DingleEighth Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 26×
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-05-03· cited 24×
- Arredondo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-14· cited 23×
- Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-06· cited 23×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-01-30· cited 21×
- Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-10· cited 20×
- Gail v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-07· cited 20×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-01· cited 17×
- Hannon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-17· cited 14×
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-13· cited 13×
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-07· cited 12×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-08· cited 130×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-08-15· cited 123×
- State v. VickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-30· cited 70×
- State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 61×
- Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-13· cited 61×
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-10-04· cited 60×
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-07-16· cited 47×
- Torres v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-11-18· cited 44×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-08-06· cited 38×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 36×
- State v. RoanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-06-09· cited 30×
- Ives v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-23· cited 27×
- Carney v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-10· cited 23×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-01-27· cited 18×
- State Ex Rel. Black v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-04-19· cited 14×
- Hanley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-07-14· cited 13×
- Zenanko v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-12-17· cited 12×
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-10-21· cited 7×
- Sessions v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.