Skip to main content

White v. State

Citations

  • 711 N.W.2d 106
  • 2006 Minn. LEXIS 145
  • 2006 WL 723486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the interests of justice did not justify review when individual failed to challenge composition of jury at proper time
  • stating that an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim is generally Knaffla-barred if it can be decided on the basis of the trial record and the briefs
  • barring all postconviction claims that were known \or should have been known\ at the time of direct appeal
  • “All of these claims can be decided on the basis of the district court record and are therefore Knaffla-barred on this postconviction review.”
  • “[W]e conclude that [petitioner’s] claims of racial discrimination in the selection of the grand jury * * * are also barred by the Knaffla rule because [petitioner] knew or should have known of these claims at the time of his direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.