Tottenham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no egregious harm when there was ample circumstantial evidence supporting the presumed fact of intent to defraud or harm and the defendant “did not present any evidence refuting the issue of intent”
• “Where the great weight of evidence supports the facts giving rise to the presumption, egregious harm is not shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).