Leftwich v. Gallaudet University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “[p]laintiff [had] filed a complaint with the [DCOHR],” and citing an exhibit purporting to be a DCOHR “Employment Intake Questionnaire”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that he was subjected to “pervasive, negative racial comments” that occurred “nearly every day for three years” were sufficient to state a hostile work environment claim
• noting that dismissal is appropriate only if the complaint on its face is conclusively time-barred
• finding that intake questionnaire qualified as a charge where the employee had checked a box similar to “Box 2”
• finding that plaintiff had exhausted administrative remedies solely by filing EEOC intake questionnaire
• finding that plaintiff had exhausted administrative remedies solely by filing EEOC intake questionnaire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).