Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/28/1996

State v. Muhammad

Citations

678 A.2d 164
145 N.J. 23
1996 N.J. LEXIS 892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that jurors must be unanimous in finding existence of aggravating factor and they must adhere to trial court’s limiting instruction and deliberate about appropriate sentence without consideration of those aggravating factors that were not unanimous
noting that jurors must be unanimous in finding existence of aggravating factor and they must adhere to trial court's limiting instruction and deliberate about appropriate sentence without consideration of those aggravating factors that were not unanimous
holding victim-impact statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(6), constitutional under federal and State constitutions
holding victim-impact statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3c(6), constitutional under federal and State constitutions
explaining requirements for admissibility of victim impact statements, and setting procedural limitations for their use
explaining requirements for admissibility of victim impact statements, and setting procedural limitations for their use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi, Wilentz, O'Hern, Handler, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

107 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Muhammad

77 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.