State v. Johans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the proper remedy in all cases where the trial court errs in failing to hold a Neil inquiry is to reverse and remand for a new trial\
• stating that \the presumption of validity of peremptory strikes established in Neil is still the law in Florida\
• \A [gender-neutral] justification for a peremptory challenge cannot be inferred merely from circumstances such as the composition of the venire or the jurors ultimately seated.\
• Neil inquiry required when objection raised that peremptory challenge is being used\ in a racially discriminatory manner\
• \[W]e hold that from this time forward a Neil inquiry is required when an objection is raised that a peremptory challenge is being used in a racially discriminatory manner.\
• Neil inquiry required when objection raised that peremptory challenge is being used \in a racially discriminatory manner\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).