Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/15/2003

White v. State

Citations

374 Md. 232
821 A.2d 459
2003 Md. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the conclusions of the trial judge are entitled to less deference” if voir dire is “cursory, rushed, and unduly limited”
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to pose \compound\ voir dire questions to the venire as a whole, followed by extensive individual voir dire
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to pose “compound” voir dire questions to the venire as a whole, followed by extensive individual voir dire
concluding that a trial court has acted within its proper discretion when, “the voir dire process is viewed as a whole, it is clear that the trial court conducted extensive voir dire examinations of prospective jurors”
“Without adequate voir dire, the trial judge is unable to fulfill his or her responsibility to eliminate those prospective jurors who will be unable to perform their duty impartially.”
police officers engaged in procedural processing dictated by statute are not engaging in interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.