Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 425 Md. 306
  • 40 A.3d 1017
  • 2012 WL 974960
  • 2012 Md. LEXIS 151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that voir dire regarding witnesses’ occupation was not mandatory when alleged victim and corroborating witness had either served in or been employed by the military because neither witness was testifying in an official capacity
  • “We review the trial [court]’s rulings on the record of the voir dire process as a whole for an abuse of discretion[.]” (Citation omitted)
  • “We review the trial [courtj’s rulings on the record of the voir dire process as a whole for an abuse of discretion!.]” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.