Skip to main content

State v. Thomas

Citations

  • 798 A.2d 566
  • 369 Md. 202
  • 2002 Md. LEXIS 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial judge abused his discretion in failing to ask question whether any jurors harbored strong feelings towards the violation of narcotics laws where defendant was charged with the possession and distribution of a controlled dangerous substance
  • holding that trial judge abused his discretion in failing to ask question whether any jurors harbored strong feelings towards the violation of narcotics laws where defendant was charged with the possession and distribution of a controlled dangerous substance
  • noting that a police officer making a photographic identification of a suspect six weeks after an undercover drug purchase “was not a lay witness describing a criminal to police; he was a police officer making a mental note of what he had seen during the commission of a crime”
  • bias due to the nature of the narcotics crime with which the defendant is charged
  • bias due to the nature of the narcotics crime with which the defendant is charged
  • whether a prospective juror has strong feelings regarding violations of narcotic laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Harrell, Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.