Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/17/1997
Hughes v. State
Citations
- 695 A.2d 132
- 346 Md. 80
- 1997 Md. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inquiry is whether the officer, based on the totality of the circumstances, knew or should have known that the question was likely to elicit an incriminating response
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alford, Cecil EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-02-08· cited 134×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 64×
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-02-08· cited 55×
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-15· cited 44×
- Dixon v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 36×
- Cruz, Adelfo RamirezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-13· cited 35×
- In Re Joshua David C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-08-29· cited 29×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-02· cited 29×
- Fenner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-12· cited 26×
- Prioleau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-09· cited 21×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-13· cited 21×
- State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-09· cited 17×
- Drury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-08· cited 16×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-07· cited 12×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-07· cited 11×
- Mulley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-02· cited 5×
- State v. ReamMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-04-18· cited 4×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-24· cited 3×
- James Toler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-20· cited 3×
- Tobiassen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-08· cited 3×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- United States v. Robert Augustine D'anjou, A/K/A Dennis DennisonFourth Circuit· 1994-02-16· cited 296×
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaNinth Circuit· 1986-12-08· cited 221×
- United States v. Salvador Parra, Also Known as Salvador Ledezma, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Sotelo, Also Known as Ricardo DuarteTenth Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 131×
- People v. RodneyNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-03-23· cited 131×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkSecond Circuit· 1975-08-13· cited 120×
- United States v. John W. Hinckley, Jr. United States of America v. John W. Hinckley, JrD.C. Circuit· 1982-02-23· cited 106×
- United States v. Ozzie Lee Avery, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1983-09-29· cited 97×
- United States v. Jesus Mata-AbundizNinth Circuit· 1983-10-04· cited 97×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-10· cited 87×
- United States v. Homero Glen-Archila, Dudley Astor May-MitchellEleventh Circuit· 1982-06-04· cited 74×
- United States v. Robert Lee MorrowFourth Circuit· 1984-04-05· cited 56×
- United States v. William A. McLaughlinEighth Circuit· 1985-11-13· cited 48×
- United States v. Derrick Deon Horton, A/K/A Thomas Deon Hill, United States of America v. Derrick Deon Horton, A/K/A Thomas Deon HillEighth Circuit· 1989-04-18· cited 44×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-15· cited 37×
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-01· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.