Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/7/2005
Logan v. State
Citations
- 882 A.2d 330
- 164 Md. App. 1
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “in contrast to traditional voluntariness, ‘there is an absolute prohibition upon any trickery which misleads the suspect as to the existence or dimensions of any of the applicable [Miranda ] rights ....’”
- “Even if appellant’s questions were not well framed, ... he sought to discover cause for disqualification based on bias .... On that basis, if the court below was not satisfied with the form, it could have reformulated the questions or allowed defense counsel to do so.”
- “Even if appellant’s questions were not well framed, ... he sought to discover cause for disqualification based on bias .... On that basis, if the court below was not satisfied with the form, it could have reformulated the questions or allowed defense counsel to do so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Eyler, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-01· cited 40×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-26· cited 39×
- Curtin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-07· cited 15×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 12×
- In Re Lavar D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
- State v. LuckettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-05· cited 2×
- Warren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 2×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-14· cited 2×
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 804×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-18· cited 231×
- People v. BowelIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-01-23· cited 188×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorD.C. Circuit· 1945-01-10· cited 129×
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-14· cited 129×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.