Skip to main content

State v. Tolbert

Citations

  • 850 A.2d 1192
  • 381 Md. 539
  • 2004 Md. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the precustodial Miranda warnings were \sufficiently proximate in time and place to custodial status to inform\ the defendant of his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and thus readministration of the rights was not required
  • circuit court suppressed confession based upon a Miranda violation and a finding that the confession was involuntary; Court of Appeals addressed both grounds, holding that the court erred in suppressing the confession on each ground
  • “In Maryland, when the State intends to use a confession ... given by the defendant to the police during custodial interrogation, the prosecution must, upon proper challenge, establish ... that the statement satisfies the mandate of Miranda v. Arizona.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.