Skip to main content

Khaliq Khan v. State

Citations

  • 213 Md. App. 554
  • 74 A.3d 844
  • 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under the open door doctrine, a party can use rebuttal evidence of a prior incident, but the rebuttal evidence cannot seek to elicit \ details \ of the prior incident
  • holding that once “the proverbial door was opened to the disputed testimony, it remained for the trial court to balance its probative value against its prejudicial nature”
  • holding that, under the open 18 door doctrine, a party can use rebuttal evidence of a prior incident, but the rebuttal evidence cannot seek to elicit “details” of the prior incident
  • ‘‘[a] finding of discrimination, or a finding of no discrimination, is a finding of fact’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matricciani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.