Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/7/2001
West v. State
Citations
- 768 A.2d 150
- 137 Md. App. 314
- 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Reviewing courts ... pay great deference to that determination. Reflecting a preference for the warrant process .... ”
- numerous arrests within ten years of the issuance of the warrant are relevant to the probable cause determination
- numerous arrests within ten years of the issuance of the warrant are relevant to the probable cause determination
- great deference is paid to probable cause determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler, Moylan, Thieme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-08· cited 70×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-09· cited 52×
- Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-11· cited 51×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-30· cited 36×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-12· cited 23×
- Behrel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-07· cited 20×
- Massey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-07· cited 17×
- State v. CabralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-06· cited 16×
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-29· cited 14×
- Dashiell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-05· cited 14×
- State v. RileyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-13· cited 12×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-06· cited 11×
- Pringle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-28· cited 10×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-08-23· cited 8×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-15· cited 7×
- Moats v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-10-25· cited 7×
- State v. GreenstreetCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-13· cited 6×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 6×
- Lindsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-16· cited 6×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-02· cited 5×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 854×
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 821×
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 629×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-20· cited 248×
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaNinth Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 219×
- Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
- United States v. Bruce L. CraigFifth Circuit· 1988-12-13· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.