Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/9/2003
Fitzgerald v. State
Citations
- 837 A.2d 989
- 153 Md. App. 601
- 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing, in a case concerning whether a K-9 alert provided probable cause to search an apartment, that “[t]he same degree of certainty that will support the warrantless Carroll doctrine search of an automobile will, ipso facto, support the warrantless arrest of a suspect”
- appellate court’s role in reviewing suppression ruling concerning warrantless activity focuses on court’s decision whether to exclude challenged evidence
- “[T]he vestibule of the apartment house was no different than a public street or an open field. The police needed no justification for being there.”
- “at a suppression hearing challenging the issuance of a search warrant, the only evidence that should be considered by the court is that which is confined within the ‘four corners’ of the warrant and its application.”
- suggesting Maryland Constitution requires no different result than Fourth Amendment
- “If the defendant has no Fourth Amendment interest in the thing seized or the place searched, the defendant is barred, at the threshold, from raising the issue of the Fourth Amendment merits, whatever those merits might have been with respect to someone else.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler, Adkins, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-10· cited 95×
- Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-11· cited 51×
- State v. RabbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-15· cited 40×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-30· cited 36×
- Kor-Ko Ltd. v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-01-25· cited 26×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-24· cited 25×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 24×
- State v. OforiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 23×
- Stokeling v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 21×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-27· cited 20×
- United States v. BroadwayD. Colorado· 2008-02-25· cited 17×
- State v. CabralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-06· cited 16×
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-29· cited 14×
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-04-25· cited 13×
- In re Darryl P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-25· cited 12×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-06· cited 11×
- Feaster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-29· cited 10×
- State v. RabbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 8×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-28· cited 8×
- State v. HardingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-10· cited 8×
Cites
143 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.