Skip to main content

Lindsey v. State

Citations

  • 226 Md. App. 253
  • 127 A.3d 627
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because common area adjacent to apartment door is not curtilage and resident has no reasonable expectation of privacy in that common area, canine sniff conducted from common area is not search under fourth amendment
  • because common area adjacent to apartment door is not curtilage and resident has no reasonable expecta- tion of privacy in that common area, canine sniff con- ducted from common area is not search under fourth amendment
  • area in front of defendant's apartment door not curtilage
  • explaining Dunn in similar terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krauser, Hotten, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.