Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/30/2016

State v. Andrews

Citations

227 Md. App. 350
134 A.3d 324
2016 Md. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in real-time cell phone location information, and requiring a search warrant to use a CSS
holding that the use of a cell site simulator requires a search warrant based on probable cause, and finding that the trial court properly suppressed evidence obtained through the use of the cell-site simulator
describing cell phones as “a piece of technology so ubiquitous as to be on the person of practically every eitizen”
\no one expects that their [cell] phone information is being sent directly to the police department\ [citation omitted]
defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in real-time * cellular telephone location information
“The analytical framework [of the reasonableness of a search or seizure] requires analysis of the functionality of the surveillance device and the range of information potentially revealed by its use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leahy, Friedman, Thieme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.