Andresen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the information on which the affidavits was based was stale because of a three-month delay in the application for the search warrant
• “[W]here a charge fails to state an offense, by failing to allege all necessary elements of the crime, appellate review is not foreclosed by such failure.”
• considerations for timeliness of search include character of crime, criminal, thing to be seized, and place to be searched

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).