Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/20/1968
Williams v. State
Citations
- 247 A.2d 731
- 5 Md. App. 450
- 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, in a case tried by the court, the appellate court may entertain the issue of sufficiency in the absence of a motion for judgment of acquittal, because the case shall be reviewed on the law and the evidence
- providing a thorough discussion of the history of what is now Rule 8 — 131(c)
- providing a thorough discussion of the history of what is now Rule 8-131(c)
- Court may entertain issue in jury case only upon denial of motion by lower court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
203 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-18· cited 112×
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-18· cited 94×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-10· cited 92×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-06· cited 83×
- Folk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-03-31· cited 73×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-31· cited 72×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-08-12· cited 60×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-06-06· cited 60×
- Lindsay v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-11-17· cited 57×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-08-10· cited 56×
- Hignut v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-04-06· cited 53×
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-04-30· cited 51×
- Branch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-09· cited 51×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-24· cited 49×
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-29· cited 46×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-19· cited 41×
- King v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-01-20· cited 37×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-18· cited 37×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Agresti v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-10-27· cited 66×
- Royal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-11· cited 65×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-13· cited 54×
- Fabian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-29· cited 51×
- Graef v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-14· cited 44×
- Dunlap v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-06-26· cited 33×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-09-01· cited 31×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-06-15· cited 30×
- Plumley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-13· cited 27×
- Journigan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-11-09· cited 26×
- League v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1872-06-18· cited 26×
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-10-12· cited 23×
- Coates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-18· cited 21×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-03· cited 17×
- Rawlings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1852-12-15· cited 17×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-27· cited 16×
- Lotharp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-04-03· cited 14×
- Roeder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 14×
- Price v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 12×
- Jason v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-10· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.