Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 247 A.2d 731
  • 5 Md. App. 450
  • 1968 Md. App. LEXIS 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in a case tried by the court, the appellate court may entertain the issue of sufficiency in the absence of a motion for judgment of acquittal, because the case shall be reviewed on the law and the evidence
  • providing a thorough discussion of the history of what is now Rule 8 — 131(c)
  • providing a thorough discussion of the history of what is now Rule 8-131(c)
  • Court may entertain issue in jury case only upon denial of motion by lower court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

203 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.