Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/6/2004
State v. Cabral
Citations
- 859 A.2d 285
- 159 Md. App. 354
- 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a drug dog’s alert generated probable cause for a search
- stating that the fact that a trained dog is capable of detecting odors up to 72 hours after contraband is present in the vehicle only strengthens the probable cause finding due to the dog's superior sense of smell
- a positive alert by a drug dog gives probable cause to search, even if the alert pertains to a residual odor
- so observing, and collecting cases from other jurisdictions drawing similar conclusions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Padilla v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-30· cited 31×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-22· cited 31×
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-07· cited 25×
- State v. OforiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 23×
- State v. YeoumansIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-11-02· cited 20×
- State v. Tam Thi Thu NguyenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-01-03· cited 20×
- State v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-20· cited 14×
- Fair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-30· cited 9×
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-29· cited 7×
- Eusebio v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-03-02· cited 5×
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-04· cited 3×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-30· cited 1×
Cites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,610×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 987×
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-14· cited 129×
- Wilkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-25· cited 104×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-09-12· cited 99×
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-20· cited 96×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-22· cited 91×
- Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-11· cited 86×
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-11· cited 85×
- Arroyo v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-10· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.