United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-Escarsega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it can be “unjust” to allow a fugitive to participate via deposition
• noting that reversible error has been found where \the material considered by the jury relates to a material aspect of the case\
• noting that criminal forfeiture is an additional penalty for an offense
• noting that criminal forfeiture is an additional penalty for an offense
• upholding warrant based in part on information almost two years old regarding defendant’s involvement in widespread narcotics conspiracy
• refusing to reverse denial of Rule 15 motion due, in part, to cumulative nature of potential evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).