Ninth Circuit· 6/10/1999
Weissman v. Quail Lodge Inc.
Citations
- 179 F.3d 1194
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 5826
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4540
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11896
- 1999 WL 374076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the district court violated attorney's due process rights by failing to give him notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to sanctioning him
- finding that the district court violated attorney’s due process rights by failing to give him notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to sanctioning him
- agreeing with the court in Williams that “words themselves do not constitute sanctions” and do not inde- pendently trigger a right to appeal
- agreeing with Williams that “words themselves do not constitute sanc- tions” and do not independently support right to appeal, but reviewing sanction restricting attorney’s right to file objec- tions to proposed class action settlement agreements
- “District courts have the inherent power to file 27 restrictive pre-filing orders against vexatious litigants with abusive and lengthy histories of litigation.”
- a court imposing 13 sanctions “must clearly delineate under which authority it acts to insure that the attendant 14 requirements are met”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Restani, Tashima, Trade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2007-08-31· cited 577×
- Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2014-08-04· cited 398×
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nThird Circuit· 2007-02-01· cited 226×
- Pacific Harbor Capital, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellee v. Carnival Air Lines, Inc.,defendant, and Jeffrey M. Herman Stuart S. Mermelstein, Movants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 2000-04-27· cited 147×
- Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterNinth Circuit· 2005-03-03· cited 146×
- Price v. LehtinenNinth Circuit· 2009-04-28· cited 130×
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationThird Circuit· 2007-02-01· cited 96×
- Patelco Credit Union v. SahniNinth Circuit· 2001-08-27· cited 84×
- Hutchinson (Godlove) v. PfeilTenth Circuit· 2000-04-04· cited 56×
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United States, and Mikki Graves Walser, Sanctioned Party-AppellantFederal Circuit· 2003-01-13· cited 56×
- United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio TalaoNinth Circuit· 2000-08-23· cited 55×
- In Re Brooks-HamiltonNinth Circuit· 2009-01-21· cited 40×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyNinth Circuit· 2013-11-07· cited 38×
- Keach v. County of SchenectadySecond Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 27×
- United States v. ZhouSecond Circuit· 2005-11-01· cited 26×
- Floyd v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2014-07-30· cited 26×
- Adams v. Ford Motor Co.Third Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 25×
- United States v. GonzalesTenth Circuit· 2003-04-29· cited 22×
- In Re CorrinetNinth Circuit· 2011-07-19· cited 21×
- Smyth v. City of Oakland (In Re Brooks-Hamilton)Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-19· cited 21×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesNinth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 4,024×
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1988-01-21· cited 679×
- De Long v. HennesseyNinth Circuit· 1990-08-30· cited 591×
- J. O'LOughLin v. John Doe, a Member of the Medical Staff Who Administers Medications at 5:00 P.M. Director of Adult DetentionNinth Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 484×
- PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph A. BATARSE, Defendant, Jan C. Nielsen, AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-05-28· cited 277×
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionThird Circuit· 1987-12-14· cited 264×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-03-01· cited 240×
- Western Systems, Inc. Lee M. Holmes v. Richard F. Ulloa David J. UlloaNinth Circuit· 1992-06-23· cited 151×
- Lee Edward Warren v. Douglas GuelkerNinth Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 136×
- Moy v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1990-06-27· cited 134×
- Black v. Cutter LaboratoriesSupreme Court· 1956-06-04· cited 118×
- Williams v. United States (In Re Williams)First Circuit· 1998-09-14· cited 78×
- Tom Growney Equipment, Inc. v. Shelley Irrigation Development, Inc., Appeal of Stompoly & Even, P.CNinth Circuit· 1987-12-18· cited 76×
- The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. RossNinth Circuit· 1984-06-25· cited 65×
- George Peabody Citizens Right of Way Dedication at Pukoo Committee v. Maud Van Cortland Hill Schroll Trust, and James M. DombroskiNinth Circuit· 1990-01-23· cited 34×
- Clark Equipment Company v. Lift Parts Manufacturing Company IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1992-11-25· cited 31×
- In Re Oracle Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1994-06-14· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.