· 3/3/2005
Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence Sutter
Citations
- 399 F.3d 1101
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3577
- 2005 WL 486995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that procedural due process requires 9 a court provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before imposing a sanction
- discussing court’s 3 authority to impose civil sanctions “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what 4 he had refused to do.”
- discussing court’s 21 authority to impose civil sanctions “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what 22 he had refused to do.”
- discussing court’s authority to impose civil sanctions 5 “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what he had refused to do.”
- affirming sanctions against Ford for violating two pretrial in limine orders
- “In particular, ‘it is axiomatic that procedural due process requires notice of the grounds for, and possible types of, sanctions.’” (brackets and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Paez, Bea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.