Skip to main content
· 3/3/2005

Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence Sutter

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 1101
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3577
  • 2005 WL 486995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that procedural due process requires 9 a court provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before imposing a sanction
  • discussing court’s 3 authority to impose civil sanctions “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what 4 he had refused to do.”
  • discussing court’s 21 authority to impose civil sanctions “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what 22 he had refused to do.”
  • discussing court’s authority to impose civil sanctions 5 “intended to be remedial by coercing the defendant to do what he had refused to do.”
  • affirming sanctions against Ford for violating two pretrial in limine orders
  • “In particular, ‘it is axiomatic that procedural due process requires notice of the grounds for, and possible types of, sanctions.’” (brackets and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Paez, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.