Skip to main content
· 12/14/1987

Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen Division

Citations

  • 835 F.2d 479
  • 95 A.L.R. Fed. 93
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1378
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1587
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16270
  • 1987 WL 22199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that practitioners \invite retribution from courts ... when the Rule is invoked for an improper purpose\
  • \Rule 11 sanctions are improper in situations which do not involve signing a paper\
  • Rule 11 sanctions only apply in situations involving attorney’s signing paper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weis, Stapleton, Cohill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.