Tom Growney Equipment, Inc. v. Shelley Irrigation Development, Inc., Appeal of Stompoly & Even, P.C

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that burden of proving 26 Rule 11 sanctions were not justified was erroneously placed on non-moving party
• district court abused its discretion where \[n]o notice was given of the court's intention to impose sanctions and no opportunity was offered to explain the allegedly improper filings\
• burden of proof for Rule 11 11 | sanctions falls on the moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).