Western Systems, Inc. Lee M. Holmes v. Richard F. Ulloa David J. Ulloa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he test for whether a subsequent action is barred is whether it arises from the same transaction, or series of transactions as the original action”
• explaining that in the Ninth Circuit, the 22 relitigation exception is held to apply “where a prior federal decision ‘necessarily 23 precludes’ a certain result even if that result was not itself actually litigated”
• applying transactional approach to determine applicability of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).