United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio Talao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a formal finding of a violation eliminates the need for difficult line drawing in much the same way as a court’s explicit pronouncement that its words are intended as a sanction”
• providing that Rule 2-100 “is a rule governing attorney conduct and the duties of attorneys, and does not create a right in a party not to be contacted by opposing counsel”
• finding district court’s order appealable where it “did more than use ‘words alone’ or render ‘routine judicial commentary’ ”
• holding this Court has jurisdiction over an attorney’s challenge to sanctions
• finding an attorney had standing to appeal a district court ruling that she violated an ethical rule because it constituted a “per se” sanction
• allowing attorney to appeal from trial court's finding of a violation of California Rules of Professional Conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).