Skip to main content
· 1/13/2003

Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United States, and Mikki Graves Walser, Sanctioned Party-Appellant

Citations

  • 315 F.3d 1346
  • 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 226
  • 24 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1898
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 448
  • 2003 WL 103274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating fact that reprimand not explicitly contained in separate order was not determinative in whether the court has entered a formal reprimand
  • noting that the reprimand was “explicit and formal, imposed as a sanction”
  • noting that the reprimand was “explicit and formal, imposed as a sanction”
  • stating fact that reprimand not explicitly contained in separate order was not determinative in whether the court has entered a formal reprimand
  • discussing “the inherent power of the court to control and specify the standards of lawyers who appear before it”
  • “Nothing in this decision should be taken as suggesting ... that other kinds of judicial criticisms of lawyers’ actions, whether contained in judicial opinions or comments in the courtroom, are also directly reviewable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clevenger, Friedman, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.