Skip to main content
· 1/28/2010

Keach v. County of Schenectady

Citations

  • 593 F.3d 218
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1888
  • 2010 WL 308838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there were no sanctions where “the district court's comments were in the nature... of routine judicial commentary or criticism” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • identifying no jurisdiction where district court “questioned” attorney’s candor and found his actions “troubling”
  • “[A] finding that an attorney is guilty of specific misconduct is an adverse decision that can be appealed.”
  • “While, typically, nonparties may not appeal from the judgments of a district court, there is an exception to this general rule where a nonparty, such as an attorney, has been held in contempt or sanctioned by the court.” (citation omitted)
  • “An appellate court can reverse an order imposing a sanction or making a finding that an attorney has violated a rule of professional conduct; it has no power to reverse a judge’s poor opinion of the skill or trustworthiness of a lawyer who has appeared before him or her.”
  • “An appellate court can reverse an order imposing a sanction or making a finding that an attorney has violated a rule of professional conduct; it has no power to reverse a judge’s poor opinion of the skill or trustworthiness of a lawyer who has appeared before him or her.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Pooler, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.