· 1/28/2010
Keach v. County of Schenectady
Citations
- 593 F.3d 218
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1888
- 2010 WL 308838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there were no sanctions where “the district court's comments were in the nature... of routine judicial commentary or criticism” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- identifying no jurisdiction where district court “questioned” attorney’s candor and found his actions “troubling”
- “[A] finding that an attorney is guilty of specific misconduct is an adverse decision that can be appealed.”
- “While, typically, nonparties may not appeal from the judgments of a district court, there is an exception to this general rule where a nonparty, such as an attorney, has been held in contempt or sanctioned by the court.” (citation omitted)
- “An appellate court can reverse an order imposing a sanction or making a finding that an attorney has violated a rule of professional conduct; it has no power to reverse a judge’s poor opinion of the skill or trustworthiness of a lawyer who has appeared before him or her.”
- “An appellate court can reverse an order imposing a sanction or making a finding that an attorney has violated a rule of professional conduct; it has no power to reverse a judge’s poor opinion of the skill or trustworthiness of a lawyer who has appeared before him or her.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Pooler, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.