Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a change in the government that has persecuted the alien may constitute a fundamental change in circumstances
• concluding that the BIA erred in relying solely on the State Department’s country report for Indonesia because it did not conduct an individualized analysis in determining whether a fundamental change in circumstances had occurred
• explaining that courts have found substantial evidence supported a fundamental change where there was evidence of “a change in the government that persecuted the petitioner,” and “where the evidence demonstrates a substantial decline in violence against persecuted groups”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-07-12· cited 1×
• Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-07-12