Eleventh Circuit· 7/12/2010
Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General
Citations
- 611 F.3d 724
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a change in the government that has persecuted the alien may constitute a fundamental change in circumstances
- concluding that the BIA erred in relying solely on the State Department’s country report for Indonesia because it did not conduct an individualized analysis in determining whether a fundamental change in circumstances had occurred
- explaining that courts have found substantial evidence supported a fundamental change where there was evidence of “a change in the government that persecuted the petitioner,” and “where the evidence demonstrates a substantial decline in violence against persecuted groups”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Wilson, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chadrick Calvin Cole v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-03-14· cited 115×
- Seck v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2011-12-08· cited 108×
- Zhou Hua Zhu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-01-04· cited 72×
- Irfan Ali v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2019-08-05· cited 63×
- Jiaren Shi v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-02-05· cited 49×
- Xiu Ying Wu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-03-12· cited 42×
- Ramon Duran Guillen v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2018-12-13· cited 25×
- Keefe Gordon v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2020-06-24· cited 15×
- Jose Fernando Castillo v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2014-06-27· cited 6×
- R-B-EBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2026-03-06· cited 1×
- Chreng v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-12-22
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tian-Yong Chen, A.K.A. Tian Yong Chen v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 2004-03-08· cited 809×
- Sergio Leonel Mendoze v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceEleventh Circuit· 2003-04-16· cited 719×
- Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 712×
- Joana C. Sepulveda v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Eleventh Circuit· 2005-03-02· cited 359×
- Lek Berishaj v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2004-08-05· cited 285×
- Ashok Chand Premila Mudaliar Chand v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-08-02· cited 273×
- Roberto Domingo Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Eleventh Circuit· 2004-05-12· cited 253×
- Mariusz Kaczmarczyk v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 1991-05-31· cited 192×
- Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali Madaar A. Osman Isack A. Osman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-01-19· cited 174×
- Sowe v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 153×
- Emil Avgoustov Krastev Neli Pecheva Krasteva v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceTenth Circuit· 2002-06-17· cited 150×
- Elma Mullai v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSixth Circuit· 2004-09-27· cited 149×
- Yeshwared Woldemeskel v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceTenth Circuit· 2001-10-10· cited 147×
- Mehmeti v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2009-06-25· cited 93×
- Palma-Mazariegos v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 67×
- Yatskin v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 2001-07-06· cited 64×
- Shehu v. GonzalesFifth Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 61×
- Alibasic v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2008-10-17· cited 50×
- Pascual v. MukaseySixth Circuit· 2007-12-19· cited 40×
- Natalia Kharkhan v. John D. AshcroftSeventh Circuit· 2003-07-31· cited 39×
Other cases named Visca Imelda v. U.S. Attorney General
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.