Joana C. Sepulveda v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that menacing calls and death threats alone were not enough to compel a finding of past persecution
• holding that menacing phone calls and death threats to a nonciti- zen did not compel a finding of persecution
• holding that three phone calls threatening the receiver with death if she did not stop her political activities did not compel a finding of persecution
• holding that three phone calls threatening the receiver with death if she did not stop her political activities did not compel a finding of persecution
• concluding that where a petitioner fails to raise arguments regarding the issue on appeal, that issue is deemed abandoned
• holding that Sepulveda could not establish a withholding of removal claim because she could not meet the standard to establish her asylum claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).