Pascual v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that most circuit courts have approved this approach, that this court did so in Abdulnoor, and that the Supreme Court’s emphasis on the persecutor’s motive suggests this approach is appropriate
• stating that there was no support for notion that anti‐government opinion would be imputed to alien when Guatemalan civil war had ended decade before and civil patrols had disbanded
• presumption from past persecution based on conscription and treatment by civil patrol and abduction by guerillas in Guatemala rebutted because civil war had ended and civil patrol had been disbanded
• presumption from past persecution based on conscription and treatment by civil patrol and abduction by guerillas in Guatemala rebutted because civil war had ended and civil patrol had been disbanded
• presumption from past persecution based on conscription and treatment by civil patrol and abduction by guerillas in Guatemala rebutted because civil war had ended and civil patrol had been disbanded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).