Roberto Domingo Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the immigration judge and the BIA could “rely heavily on” the State Department’s country report
• stating that the agency is “entitled to rely heavily” on country reports prepared by the U.S. State Department
• affirming the denial of CAT protection based on evidence that the “[g]overnment actively, al- beit not entirely successfully, combat[ted] the” harms feared
• allowing the BIA to use such reports to determine whether the Peruvian government presently acquiesced in activities of a Peruvian terrorist group, as required for CAT relief
• stating that, for CAT relief, “the burden of proof is on the applicant . . . to establish that it is more likely than not that he . . . would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal” (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).