Seck v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting BIA is not required to address each claim petitioner made
• “[W]e review the BIA’s decision, with regard to those mat- ters on which it rendered its own opinion and reasoning.”
• “[T]he mere fact that the record may support a contrary conclusion is not enough to justify a reversal of the administrative findings.” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he mere fact 24 Case: 20-10084 Date Filed: 08/25/2020 Page: 25 of 26 that the record may support a contrary conclusion is not enough” to show that the record compels reversal. (quotation marks omitted)
• issues not reached by the BIA are not properly before this Court
• remanding withholding- of-removal claim for lack of reasoned consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).