Skip to main content
· 10/10/2001

Yeshwared Woldemeskel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 257 F.3d 1185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “pattern or practice of persecution” as “‘something on the order of systematic or pervasive persecution’”
  • adopting a definition of “pattern or practice of persecution” as “‘something on the order of systematic or pervasive persecution’” (quoting Makonnen v. INS, 44 F.3d 1378, 1383 (8th Cir. 1995)
  • presumption from past persecution by former government rebutted with change in government that had persecuted petitioner and concomitant change in country conditions
  • “Given the BIA’s detailed recitation of facts and its acknowledgement that much time has passed since [petitioner’s] ordeal, we are satisfied that the BIA heard and considered all the evidence and arguments.”
  • “Given the BIA’s detailed recitation of facts and its acknowledgement that much time has passed since [petitioner’s] ordeal, we are satisfied that the BIA heard and considered all the evidence and arguments.”
  • “persecution is not defined in the regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McKay, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.