· 10/10/2001
Yeshwared Woldemeskel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Citations
- 257 F.3d 1185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining “pattern or practice of persecution” as “‘something on the order of systematic or pervasive persecution’”
- adopting a definition of “pattern or practice of persecution” as “‘something on the order of systematic or pervasive persecution’” (quoting Makonnen v. INS, 44 F.3d 1378, 1383 (8th Cir. 1995)
- presumption from past persecution by former government rebutted with change in government that had persecuted petitioner and concomitant change in country conditions
- “Given the BIA’s detailed recitation of facts and its acknowledgement that much time has passed since [petitioner’s] ordeal, we are satisfied that the BIA heard and considered all the evidence and arguments.”
- “Given the BIA’s detailed recitation of facts and its acknowledgement that much time has passed since [petitioner’s] ordeal, we are satisfied that the BIA heard and considered all the evidence and arguments.”
- “persecution is not defined in the regulations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, McKay, Cudahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.