Xiu Ying Wu v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “failure to authenticate the abortion certificate may mitigate the probative value of [the applicant’s] corroborative evidence”
• holding that “[a] court may not consider a claim raised in a petition to review a final order unless the petitioner has first exhausted her administrative remedies with regard to that claim”
• discussing the 2007 China Profile of Asylum Claims and Country Conditions
• reviewing an adverse credibility determina- tion like “other factual findings”
• “The trier of fact USCA11 Case: 21-10952 Date Filed: 05/17/2022 Page: 16 of 20 16 Opinion of the Court 21-10952 must determine credibility, and this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the BIA with respect to credibility findings.” (quotation marks omitted)
• discussing credibility and State Department reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).