E.D. New York· 6/29/1994

United States v. Upton

Citations

856 F. Supp. 727
1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8873
1994 WL 315622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

directing the Government to “provide a list of all documents to be referred to or relied upon by government witnesses”
granting severance in complex case involving defendants who were from a different city and were named in a “small portion of the indictment and against whom a small portion of the evidence is relevant.”
“None of the Atlanta defendants are charged with substantive violations alleged to have occurred at JFK.”
“[T]he government has provided defendants with the names of the grand jury witnesses who might have given exculpatory testimony, and hence the government has fulfilled its Brady obligations.”
“Even if the risk of prejudice ... does not rise to the level where severance would be required, another factor — the efficient administration of justice — tips the balance in favor of severance.”
documentary evidence and underlying events allegedly spanning more than two years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.