United States v. Trie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the mere suspicion that the grand jury may not have been properly instructed with respect to the legal definition of [a term in the indictment] is insufficient.”
• concluding that “the mere suspicion that the grand jury may not have 12 been properly instructed with respect to the legal definition of [a term in the indictment] is insufficient.”
• explaining the elements of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371
• discussing conspiracy to, among other things, solicit foreign sources for campaign contributions
• finding where \the indictment is facially valid\ that \the mere suspicion that the grand jury may not have been properly instructed ... is insufficient to establish that [the defendant] is entitled either to dismissal of the indictment or to disclosure of grand jury materials\
• finding where “the indictment is facially valid” that “the mere suspicion that the grand jury may not have been properly instructed . . . is insufficient to establish that [the defendant] is entitled either to dismissal of the indictment or to disclosure of grand jury materials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).